According to the court documents, when state child advocacy workers found out the three-year-old victim had been ‘indecently abused’, they went to Henry for answers.
The 27-year-old dad then started to tell lie after lie in an attempt to wriggle himself out of this situation. The father’s attorneys tried to make a motion to have another trial because his client has a low IQ of 57.
The defense also claimed that Henry was clearly confused when he was cross-examined. Despite the defense’s best effort to prove Henry was not competent to stand trial, psychological and psychiatric tests proved otherwise. The father also chose to testify, which he was not required to do. Read the full story here ▶
